Rate my handwriting

The handwriting in this sample is primarily focused on functionality, as evidenced by the use of pseudocode elements such as if, else, for, and array notation like A[i]. The style is consistent, with similar formations for letters and symbols. While the characters themselves are formed with varying degrees of neatness, the overall flow and layout are logical, demonstrating a focus on conveying information clearly and concisely, as opposed to aesthetic appeal.

This handwriting suggests a personality that values efficiency and logic. The emphasis on functionality suggests a pragmatic approach, possibly of someone involved in technical fields like programming or engineering. The consistent structure reflects a methodical mind that prefers clarity over elaborate decoration. The author prioritizes the core message over embellishment.

While highly legible for the most part, certain characters, particularly those within the array brackets (A[i]), could benefit from greater precision. The hurried formation of symbols like '<' and '>' could lead to misinterpretations if not examined closely. Practicing forming these symbols more carefully would improve the overall clarity of the technical notations, enhancing readability and minimizing the risk of errors. Paying more attention to spacing would also help to distinguish different elements within the code.